Spotify has been run by two chief executives since January 2026. Oracle and Comcast announced the same structure within weeks of Spotify’s announcement in autumn 2025. Shared control at the top is no longer a curiosity of founder-led start-ups, and in our view a sponsor or venture investor backing a company with two chief executives is taking a governance position, not a personality risk, and should diligence and document it as one.
Most investment theses treat the chief executive seat as a single point of accountability. When two people share it, that assumption no longer holds, and the questions it raises land at three distinct moments in the life of the investment.
At entry, the documents should say who holds the pen
In a private company, a co-CEO structure often comes from a founder paired with an operator, two co-founders who never split the role, or the merger of two businesses whose leaders both stayed. The listed examples above came through succession, which is rarer in sponsor-backed companies. It made sense when the work genuinely divided in two: one holds product and vision, the other commercial and operations. By the time an institutional investor writes a cheque, that division has usually hardened into how the company runs. The reserved matters, the board mechanics and the tie-break on a disputed call should reflect it, rather than assume a single accountable leader who does not exist.
One widely cited study is more encouraging than the structure’s reputation suggests. Matteo Arena, Stephen Ferris and Emre Unlu, writing in the Financial Review in 2011, studied publicly traded firms with co-CEOs. They found that the two leaders usually complement each other, that mutual monitoring between them appears to substitute for some board oversight, and that markets reacted positively to co-CEO appointments, and that co-CEOs were associated with higher firm valuations. They also found that these firms tend to have less independent boards and more merger activity.
In that study, the two leaders partly stood in for board oversight. A sponsor or venture board cannot delegate that way, so the governance package has to be written for two leaders, not adapted from one.
At scale, the plan tests the boundary between the two roles
A value-creation plan that needs fast decisions puts weight on the line between the two jobs. Where that line follows a real division of work, two capable leaders can carry more than one, and catch each other’s mistakes. Where it does not, every hard decision becomes a negotiation, and the board ends up arbitrating between them.
The board’s job is to know where that boundary sits before the plan bites: which decisions each leader owns outright, which need both, and how the board resolves a disagreement. Agreed at entry, those are the terms of the arrangement. Discovered in the middle of the hold, they are a dispute.
At exit, a buyer will ask which of the two stays
Some large companies keep two chief executives for years. Netflix has run with co-CEOs since 2020. But in our view a trade buyer or the next sponsor is likely to want one accountable leader, and a business going to market with two invites every buyer to ask which one stays, and to price the uncertainty into the offer.
The investor who settles that early has options: decide which leader takes the single seat, give the other a role that keeps them engaged through the process, or make the case to buyers that the pair is the asset. The investor who leaves it until a process is live faces the same question with the deal timetable as leverage for whichever executive feels short-changed.
What to check before the next board meeting
For each portfolio company led by two chief executives, write down three things: which decisions each leader owns outright, how the board resolves a disagreement between them, and what the leadership will look like at exit. If any of the three answers is “we have not discussed it”, that is the agenda.
Revised 23 October 2026 to draw on published research and public examples.
HMN Capital. Executive search and interim management for PE, venture and growth-backed businesses.
Hiring a chief executive? See how we run the search.
In a venture-backed business? See CEO search for VC-backed businesses.
Running a search for a leadership role like this? Start a conversation with HMN Capital.
Considering your own next move? Tell us where you are.
